The Guardian offers a response to the WSJ piece taking on the points raised in the WSJ piece more or less one-by-one. The Guardian piece offers the following data to support their claims:
Hansen et al. (1981) global warming projections under a scenario of high energy growth (red) and slow energy growth (blue) vs. observations (black). Actual energy growth has been between the two Hansen scenarios.
The purpose of the current post is simply to raise the following questions for the consideration of students. From what is shown of the two figures which provides the most useful and relevent information on the global climate change problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment