Ways to deal with the ever-growing amount of plastic have been discussed for decades now. While the only effective solution is to completely shut down the production and use of plastics, that is not feasible because they've become an essential part of everyday life. Due to this unwillingness, many ideas have been proposed on what to do with all this plastic. Recycling first comes to mind and has been an active strategy in the battle against plastic waste. However, in recent decades, it has actually become more expensive to recycle materials than it is to simply send them to a landfill (Romuno, 2021). Additionally, plastic industries did not help this effort by making their resin identification codes (RICs) look like the already established recycling symbol, which briefly muddied the waters on what can or cannot be recycled.
RIC vs. Recycling Symbol (Sam, 2019) |
Chemical Structures of Polyethylene and Polypropylene |
Plastics and other materials being burned |
Agency, G. (2022, July 28). What is the difference between polyethylene and polypropylene?. MDI. https://www.mdi.org/blog/post/what-is-the-difference-between-polyethylene-and-polypropylene/
Jawale, R., Umredkar, S., Khode, S., Kumbhare, H., Sharma, B., Deshpande, A., & Dutta, A. (2022, October 31). Pyrocycling-the technique to generate electricity from plastic waste. AIP Publishing. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/2494/1/070011/2827033/Pyrocycling-the-technique-to-generate-electricity?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Recycling questions answered. Tangletown Neighborhood Association. (n.d.). https://tangletown.org/recycling-questions-answered/
Romuno, J. (2021, May 11). Is recycling worth it? costs and benefits of recycling: RTS. Recycle Track Systems. https://www.rts.com/blog/is-recycling-worth-it/
Tachev, V. (2022, May 17). Burning plastic: A real waste-to-energy solution or a greenwashing tool?. Energy Tracker Asia. https://energytracker.asia/burning-plastic-a-real-waste-to-energy-solution-or-a-greenwashing-tool/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Burning plastic can affect air quality, public health (environmental factor, August 2022). National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://factor.niehs.nih.gov/2022/8/science-highlights/burning-plastic
Wirsig, K. (2023, June 16). Burning plastic is a terrible idea. here’s why. Environmental Defence. https://environmentaldefence.ca/2022/03/18/burning-plastic-is-a-terrible-idea/
I like your title and your lede. It sets up the problem of plastic pollution well. I also like the graphic which emphasizes the difficulty of effectively recycling plastic. The chemical structures are also effective emphasizing the molecular basis of the problem. Your discussion of pyrolysis as an alternative recycling method touches of the relevant points. The purpose of the blog is to consider the impression given by popular media of chemistry and chemically related issues. It might have been better, therefore, to mention something from a general interest news source like this: (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/15/recycling-plastics-producers-report) from The Guardian. This piece mentions "chemical recycling," or the pyrolysis methods you discuss to which it gives references. One possible criticism of the media discussion of the pyrolysis methods is the absence of the consideration of energy balance. The vacuum pyrolysis of plastics requires a lot of energy. It produces hydrogen which can be converted into clean energy and unsaturated hydrocarbons like ethylene which can be converted into new plastic. It would be interesting to know whether the energy produced equals the energy required for the pyrolysis. Overall an interesting post.
ReplyDelete