An article published in Science News talks about how chemists are working on trying to solve one of the biggest problems to our environment: plastics. In 2018, 27 million tons of plastic made it into landfills, while only 3 million tons were recycled. This large disparity is a result of recycling not producing useful products that manufactures can use. In the U.S., there are two major types of plastics that are recycled: high-density polyethylene (HDPE), which can be found in milk jugs and detergent containers, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which is found in soda bottles and will be the main plastic talked about in this post. The article in Science News specifically talks about four ways different ways chemists are trying to solve this recycling issue, but I will only highlight two in this post: breaking products down into different plastics and breaking plastics down to a molecular level.
A major issue when trying to recycle plastic products is that each individual
plastic needs to be separated, because when certain plastics are mixed
together, they yield unwanted results. Normally a simple assembly line where
people or machines are picking out plastics works sufficiently enough to
separate out the different types of plastics, especially when talking about
milk jugs and soda bottles, but some plastic products are complicated, like
deodorant containers, where the cap, crank, and bottle are all different types
of plastics.
George
Huber of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and colleagues set out to solve
this issue by coming up with a process that uses liquid solvents to dissolve
individual plastic components, which allows for a separation of the individual
plastics in a complex product. The process Huber and colleagues produced was
successful in getting 95% of each plastic out of the product. The process
involved stirring the plastic in a toluene solvent, which dissolved the
polyethylene layer and then putting it into DMSO, which stripped off ethylene
vinyl alcohol (EVOH), leaving only PET. The use of antisolvent chemicals was
then used to separate the polyethylene and EVOH from the solvents. Huber plans
to look at different solvents and more plastics to eventually make this method
a way of effectively sorting even the most complicated plastic products.
Another issue is that recycled plastics obtain the characteristics from the original
product, making it harder for manufactures to produce something useful out of
them and recycling breaks chemical bonds allowing products to only be recycled
a certain number of times.
Both
of these methods can still be improved on, as well as the methods not mentioned
in this post. Chemists are actively trying to solve the global plastic problem,
but many of these methods may take years to fully develop, so other actions
should be taken to reduce the use of plastics.
Sources:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/chemistry-recycling-plastic-landfills-trash-materials
Tournier, V., Topham, C.M., Gilles, A. et al. An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature. 2020, 580, 216-219. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2149-4.
Walker, T.W., Frelka, N., et al. Recycling of multilayer plastic packaging materials by solvent-targeted recovery and precipitation. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7599.
https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-do-sea-turtles-eat-unfortunately-plastic-bags
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/plastic-eating-bacteria-show-way-to-recycle-plastic-bottles-sustainably/9556.article
Your title asks the right question. You focus on chemistry as a means of problem solving rather than as a source of problems. The turtle figure is arresting. The chemistry figure is a reminder that molecules can really do useful things like recycle plastics. I am surprised that the study didn't attract reports in more widely followed media.
ReplyDelete