Posted by Jordan Berry
Recently, as reported in the Newy York Times novel neurosurgery was performed that gave new life without seizures, epilepsy, and chronic anorexia. The patient? Cronutt, a 7-year old sea lion.
Unfortunately, due to the novelty of this disease, there currently is no treatments available. According to the Washington State Department of Health, for humans they are typically put on life support until either the toxin passes through their system or they die. For sea lions without a complex medical system like humans, they tend to suffer terrible deaths by drowning while having a seizure underwater. Typical epileptic treatments like Valium, steroids, and phenobarbital fail, so a new treatment was devised where three neurosurgeons from USCF replaced hippocampal neurons in Cronutt’s brain using embryonic pig brain cells. This surgery, according to the neurosurgeons and his veterinarian caretakers, seems to have been successful at first glance. Only time will tell if this success sticks.
This article, although not chemophobic, gives negative connotations to chemistry. It does not present chemists as aloof or indiscriminate to their waste, but it does present those who use their inventions in this way. It presents the chemical medical treatments given the Cronutt as insufficient and the chemical that is produced as a toxin a direct byproduct of human activity. This article only prevents chemophobia by mentioning the specific names of the chemicals as to prevent a generalization of all industrial chemicals as a cause of this. It does not perpetuate or challenge the stereotypes of chemists since this story is not about chemists but the chemicals themselves. It does argue that there needs to be more attention placed on our oceans, but does not mention any specific actions chemists can take to alleviate these issues. As the story concludes, one of the veterinarians mention, “Even if it doesn’t work, and there’s a chance it won’t work, maybe Cronutt’s purpose is to educate that there are toxins in our water and our ocean needs our attention.”
This is a very intriguing story. You summarize it pretty well and in your own voice. Your title is intriguing and a little puzzling. Probably a good strategy to attract interest. The graphics liven things up effectively. The chemical structures emphasize that we are talking about molecules and chemistry even for the chemically uninitiated. Your analysis of the way chemistry is presented is defensible. Another careful proof-read might be in order. eg "there is no treatments..." and "This poison is, for one thing, a neurotoxin that has..."
ReplyDelete